Farmers' National Bank v. Snodgrass
This text of 45 P. 758 (Farmers' National Bank v. Snodgrass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
We think the claim of the appellant Palmer is well taken. The rule seems well settled that where one of several sureties, after all had signed, and before the debt has been paid, obtains from the principal a mortgage or other security for his indemnity, it will inure to the benefit of his cosurety: Brandt on Suretyship and Guaranty, § 268; Sheldon on Subrogation, § 143; Steele v. Mealing, 24 Ala. 285; Brown v. Bay, 18 N. H. 102. Under this rule the Proebstel mortgage inured to the benefit of Palmer, and, this being so, it necessarily follows that his equities are prior in time and superior in right to those of Predmore, who became a cosurety of the Proebstels for Snodgrass long after the mortgage was executed. As to Palmer, the mortgage took effect from its execution and delivery, but not as to Predmore until the note upon which he was a cosurety was made, some eighteen months thereafter: Van Winkle v. Johnson, 11 Or. 469 (5 Pac. 922); and hence the latter’s rights thereunder are subject to those of Palmer. The decree will therefore be modified accordingly. Modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 P. 758, 29 Or. 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farmers-national-bank-v-snodgrass-or-1898.