Farmers' National Bank v. Snodgrass

45 P. 758, 29 Or. 395
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 18, 1898
StatusPublished

This text of 45 P. 758 (Farmers' National Bank v. Snodgrass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farmers' National Bank v. Snodgrass, 45 P. 758, 29 Or. 395 (Or. 1898).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bean.

We think the claim of the appellant Palmer is well taken. The rule seems well settled that where one of several sureties, after all had signed, and before the debt has been paid, obtains from the principal a mortgage or other security for his indemnity, it will inure to the benefit of his cosurety: Brandt on Suretyship and Guaranty, § 268; Sheldon on Subrogation, § 143; Steele v. Mealing, 24 Ala. 285; Brown v. Bay, 18 N. H. 102. Under this rule the Proebstel mortgage inured to the benefit of Palmer, and, this being so, it necessarily follows that his equities are prior in time and superior in right to those of Predmore, who became a cosurety of the Proebstels for Snodgrass long after the mortgage was executed. As to Palmer, the mortgage took effect from its execution and delivery, but not as to Predmore until the note upon which he was a cosurety was made, some eighteen months thereafter: Van Winkle v. Johnson, 11 Or. 469 (5 Pac. 922); and hence the latter’s rights thereunder are subject to those of Palmer. The decree will therefore be modified accordingly. Modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Steele v. Mealing
24 Ala. 285 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1854)
Van Winkle v. Johnson
11 Or. 469 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 P. 758, 29 Or. 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farmers-national-bank-v-snodgrass-or-1898.