Farmers National Bank of Geneva v. McKinnon

134 So. 919, 223 Ala. 698
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided May 14, 1931·No. 4 Div. 557.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

THOMAS, J.

The bill was for discovery and accounting, and there is general prayer for relief. Demurrer was overruled, and defendant appeals.

The bill states the facts that show the necessity for discovery and accounting as to defendant’s collections, renewals, etc., as to collaterals placed with it by complainant.

We have carefully considered this pleading and demurrer thereto, and are of opinion that the trial court’s ruling was without error. First National Bank of LaPine v. Cordelia Bradley, 134 So. 621; 48th Street Investment Co. et al. v. Fairfield-American Nat'l Bank, 134 So. 803; Burg v. Smith, 133 So. 687; Julian v. Woolbert, 202 Ala. 535, 81 So. 32; Hicks v. Dowdy, 202 Ala. 535, 81 So. 37; Hall v. McKeller, 155 Ala. 508, 46 So. 460; Lindsey Lumber Co. v. Mason, 165 Ala. 195, 51 So. 750.

The judgment of the circuit court, in equity, is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farmers National Bank of Geneva v. McKinnon, 134 So. 919, 223 Ala. 698 (Ala. 1931).

134 So. 919 (Farmers National Bank of Geneva v. McKinnon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dewberry v. Bank of Standing Rock
150 So. 463 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1933)
Ingram v. People's Finance Thrift Co. of Alabama
146 So. 822 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1933)
Acuff v. Rice
139 So. 91 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1932)
Cleveland Storage Co. v. Guardian Trust Co.
136 So. 731 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1931)