Farmers National Bank of Geneva v. McKinnon
This text of 134 So. 919 (Farmers National Bank of Geneva v. McKinnon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The bill was for discovery and accounting, and there is general prayer for relief. Demurrer was overruled, and defendant appeals.
The bill states the facts that show the necessity for discovery and accounting as to defendant’s collections, renewals, etc., as to collaterals placed with it by complainant.
We have carefully considered this pleading and demurrer thereto, and are of opinion that the trial court’s ruling was without error. First National Bank of LaPine v. Cordelia Bradley, 134 So. 621; 48th Street Investment Co. et al. v. Fairfield-American Nat'l Bank, 134 So. 803; Burg v. Smith, 133 So. 687; Julian v. Woolbert, 202 Ala. 535, 81 So. 32; Hicks v. Dowdy, 202 Ala. 535, 81 So. 37; Hall v. McKeller, 155 Ala. 508, 46 So. 460; Lindsey Lumber Co. v. Mason, 165 Ala. 195, 51 So. 750.
The judgment of the circuit court, in equity, is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
134 So. 919, 223 Ala. 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farmers-national-bank-of-geneva-v-mckinnon-ala-1931.