Farmers & Merchants State Bank of Morgan v. Zamzow

205 N.W. 452, 164 Minn. 526, 1925 Minn. LEXIS 1425
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedOctober 30, 1925
DocketNo. 24,718.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 205 N.W. 452 (Farmers & Merchants State Bank of Morgan v. Zamzow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farmers & Merchants State Bank of Morgan v. Zamzow, 205 N.W. 452, 164 Minn. 526, 1925 Minn. LEXIS 1425 (Mich. 1925).

Opinion

t PER CURIAM.

Replevin for the owner’s share of crops, the case having been tried as one for conversion. The only issue was one of fact as to whether inter-vener, Amelia Zamzow, or her husband, Julius Zamzow, raised the crop in question. On that issue the verdict was for plaintiff and against inter-vener, plaintiff claiming under a cropping contract with Julius Zamzow.

The evidence is inconsistent at so many points with intervener’s claim that the jury was warranted in rejecting it, as they did by the verdict. Her husband raised and harvested the crop, and, without objection from intervener, had it pretty well disposed of for the benefit of himself and his own creditors, other than plaintiff, before the intervener asserted her claim or made any pretense of ownership. The resulting verdict against her was therefore justified, and, having been confirmed by the denial of the motion for a new trial, cannot be interfered with here.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barr v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada
200 So. 240 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 N.W. 452, 164 Minn. 526, 1925 Minn. LEXIS 1425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farmers-merchants-state-bank-of-morgan-v-zamzow-minn-1925.