Farmers Merchants National Bank v. R.H. Mies
200 N.W. 748, 161 Minn. 518
Opinion
Action on a promissory note, plaintiff, an indorsee, claiming to be a holder in due course. The defense was want of consideration and fraud. The trial was to the court' without a jury. The decision was for plaintiff, and this appeal is from an order denying defendant a new trial.
The court found that plaintiff was a holder in due course, and there is nothing in the record justifying our interference with that finding, which of course controls the result.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Farmers Merchants National Bank v. R.H. Mies, 200 N.W. 748, 161 Minn. 518 (Mich. 1924).
200 N.W. 748 (Farmers Merchants National Bank v. R.H. Mies) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Boushor v. Kuhlmann
200 N.W. 748 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1924)