Farmers Merchants National Bank v. R.H. Mies
This text of 200 N.W. 748 (Farmers Merchants National Bank v. R.H. Mies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action on a promissory note, plaintiff, an indorsee, claiming to be a holder in due course. The defense was want of consideration and fraud. The trial was to the court' without a jury. The decision was for plaintiff, and this appeal is from an order denying defendant a new trial.
The court found that plaintiff was a holder in due course, and there is nothing in the record justifying our interference with that finding, which of course controls the result.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
200 N.W. 748, 161 Minn. 518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farmers-merchants-national-bank-v-rh-mies-minn-1924.