Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Amerson

91 S.E. 999, 19 Ga. App. 591, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 242
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 20, 1917·No. 7801·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. Grounds of a motion for new trial not referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error will be treated as abandoned.

2. The evidence of the witness Wells was not inadmissible for the reason stated in the motion for a new trial. Where a lengthy extract from the evidence was objected to as a whole and on several grounds, and some of it was admissible, the objection to the whole was properly overruled. Great Southern &c. Co. v. Guthrie, 13 Ga. App. 288, 292 (79 S. E. 162).

3. There was evidence sufficient to support the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Amerson, 91 S.E. 999, 19 Ga. App. 591, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 242 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

91 S.E. 999 (Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Amerson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Great Southern Accident & Fidelity Co. v. Guthrie
79 S.E. 162 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)