Farmers & Merchants' Bank of Baltimore v. Horsey
This text of 7 Del. 385 (Farmers & Merchants' Bank of Baltimore v. Horsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action by a bona fide holder of the note in question for a valuable consideration against the maker of it and a party primarily and absolutely liable upon the face of it. A negotiable promissory note drawn in blank as to the payee of it, as this was, may be filled with the name of the bona fide holder of it for a valuable consideration, either before or after its maturity. | He cannot fill it with the name of any other person, but ‘ in a case like the present, he may at any time fill it with his own name, either before, or after its maturity, and there is no principle of law we think better settled in re-I gord to such negotiable paper.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Del. 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farmers-merchants-bank-of-baltimore-v-horsey-delsuperct-1861.