Farmers' & Mechanics' Bank v. Butler

12 N.W. 36, 48 Mich. 192, 1882 Mich. LEXIS 771
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 19, 1882·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Cooley, J.

A negotiable note given by tbe defendant and purchased by the plaintiff in good faith before it became due, is contested by the defendant on the ground that it was obtained from him by duress. The circuit court decided that the defence was not available. This was correct.

The cases of Gibbs v. Linabury 22 Mich. 479 and Anderson v. Walter 34 Mich. 113, which are supposed to countenance the defence, are different from this. The defence in each of those cases was that the party had never executed as a promissory note the instrument in that form which was-sued upon; and if the fact was established, the paper was no more his than- if his signature had been forged by another. In this case the making of the note was not disputed.

The judgment must be affirmed with costs.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farmers' & Mechanics' Bank v. Butler, 12 N.W. 36, 48 Mich. 192, 1882 Mich. LEXIS 771 (Mich. 1882).

12 N.W. 36 (Farmers' & Mechanics' Bank v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mack v. Prang
79 N.W. 770 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1899)
Green v. Wilkie
36 L.R.A. 434 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1896)