Farmers' & Mechanics' Bank of Savings v. Christensen

51 Cal. 571
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1877
DocketNo. 5227
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 51 Cal. 571 (Farmers' & Mechanics' Bank of Savings v. Christensen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farmers' & Mechanics' Bank of Savings v. Christensen, 51 Cal. 571 (Cal. 1877).

Opinion

By the Court:

The answer denies that the promissory note remains unpaid and that anything remains due thereon. This denial, of itself; cast the onus upon plaintiff, to prove the nonpayment by production of the note, or otherwise.

The answer also avers that the note was satisfied on the day it became due, by conveyance to the payee, while he was the “holder ” thereof, without any notice of the alleged prior assignment.

This denial and averment were sufficient to raise issues of fact, and the court below erred in rendering judgment for the plaintiff upon the pleadings.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Melone v. Ruffino
62 P. 93 (California Supreme Court, 1900)
Brennan v. Brennan
122 Cal. 440 (California Supreme Court, 1893)
Botto v. Vandament
7 P. 753 (California Supreme Court, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 Cal. 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farmers-mechanics-bank-of-savings-v-christensen-cal-1877.