Farmers' Grist Milling Co. v. Lovell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Farmers' Grist Milling Co. v. Lovell

78 Mo. App. 320, 1899 Mo. App. LEXIS 51

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 24, 1899

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 78 Mo. App. 320 (Farmers' Grist Milling Co. v. Lovell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farmers' Grist Milling Co. v. Lovell, 78 Mo. App. 320, 1899 Mo. App. LEXIS 51 (Mo. Ct. App. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

BIGGS, J.

-The plaintiff employed the defendant to buy wheat, and as compensation it agreed to pay him one cent a bushel. The wheat was to be purchased from farmers and plaintiff was to furnish sacks. The plaintiff'failed to get back four hundred and ninety-nine of the sacks which it delivered to defendant. In this action it seeks to recover their value, upon the ground that the defendant agreed to become responsible for their return. The defendant denies this. Upon this simple issue of fact the case was tried. The court submitted the case upon proper instructions and the finding was for the defendant. As there is abundant evidence to support the verdict, we will affirm the judgment.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BIGGS, J.

-The plaintiff employed the defendant to buy wheat, and as compensation it agreed to pay him one cent a bushel. The wheat was to be purchased from farmers and plaintiff was to furnish sacks. The plaintiff'failed to get back four hundred and ninety-nine of the sacks which it delivered to defendant. In this action it seeks to recover their value, upon the ground that the defendant agreed to become responsible for their return. The defendant denies this. Upon this simple issue of fact the case was tried. The court submitted the case upon proper instructions and the finding was for the defendant. As there is abundant evidence to support the verdict, we will affirm the judgment.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 Mo. App. 320, 1899 Mo. App. LEXIS 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farmers-grist-milling-co-v-lovell-moctapp-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack