Farmers Co-operative Mfg. Co. v. Drake

22 S.E. 1004, 96 Ga. 766
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 15, 1895·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. The pendency in this court of a bill of exceptions assigning as error the granting of an order authorizing a receiver to sell certain property, there having been no supersedeas as required by law in cases of this kind, was no obstacle to the hearing and determination of a second application to sell, presented by the receiver to the judge.

2. Under the facts disclosed by the record, there was no error in refusing to vacate the order of sale which had been granted upon the receiver’s second application. Judgment affirmed,.

Harrison & Peeples, for plain tiff in error. J. S. Boynton and R. T. Daniel, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farmers Co-operative Mfg. Co. v. Drake, 22 S.E. 1004, 96 Ga. 766 (Ga. 1895).

22 S.E. 1004 (Farmers Co-operative Mfg. Co. v. Drake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Macon v. Ries
179 S.E. 529 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)
Smalling v. Cox
159 S.E. 663 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Estes v. Callahan
139 S.E. 532 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)
Munford v. Peeples
111 S.E. 393 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)