Farmers Bank v. Roberson
112 S.E. 294, 28 Ga. App. 569, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 703
This text of 112 S.E. 294 (Farmers Bank v. Roberson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Farmers Bank v. Roberson, 112 S.E. 294, 28 Ga. App. 569, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 703 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).
Opinion
1. The alleged newly diseovéred evidence is merely cumulative and is not of such character as would probably cause a different verdict upon another trial.
2. Under ali the facts of the case, the verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
112 S.E. 294, 28 Ga. App. 569, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farmers-bank-v-roberson-gactapp-1922.