Farmers' Bank v. Ritter

12 A. 659, 9 Sadler 433, 22 Week. No. 128, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 918
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 20, 1888·No. No. 130, E. D.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The surviving members of the firm of George E. Jacoby & Son were the proper persons to execute the assignment, and the administrators of the alleged special partner had nothing- to do with it. The matter was one for the partnetrship creditors and the surviving partners alone.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farmers' Bank v. Ritter, 12 A. 659, 9 Sadler 433, 22 Week. No. 128, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 918 (Pa. 1888).

12 A. 659 (Farmers' Bank v. Ritter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bass v. State
34 La. 494 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1882)