Farmers' Bank v. Ritter
12 A. 659, 9 Sadler 433, 22 Week. No. 128, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 918
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 20, 1888
DocketNo. 130, E. D.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 12 A. 659 (Farmers' Bank v. Ritter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Farmers' Bank v. Ritter, 12 A. 659, 9 Sadler 433, 22 Week. No. 128, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 918 (Pa. 1888).
Opinion
The surviving members of the firm of George E. Jacoby & Son were the proper persons to execute the assignment, and the administrators of the alleged special partner had nothing- to do with it. The matter was one for the partnetrship creditors and the surviving partners alone.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bass v. State
34 La. 494 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1882)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
12 A. 659, 9 Sadler 433, 22 Week. No. 128, 1888 Pa. LEXIS 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farmers-bank-v-ritter-pa-1888.