Farmer v. State

691 So. 2d 47, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3236, 1997 WL 163281
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Farmer v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 672 So. 2d 639
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 9, 1997·No. No. 96-1835·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this belated appeal, Farmer appeals his judgments and sentences imposed after he pled guilty to charges of burglary and grand theft. Appellant’s negotiated plea agreement clearly states that he agreed to plead guilty and to be sentenced as an habitual offender to three and one-half years in prison for burglary on count one in each of three cases to run concurrently followed by two years’ probation concurrent for grand theft on count two in each of the three cases. After accepting appellant’s plea, the court imposed the sentence of three and one-half years in prison followed by two years’ probation on each of the six counts. Although the court imposed a sentence exceeding the plea agreement, the court did not afford appellant an opportunity to withdraw his plea as required by Goins v. State, 672 So.2d 30, 32 (Fla.1996). Accordingly, the cause is reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

MINER, ALLEN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farmer v. State, 691 So. 2d 47, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3236, 1997 WL 163281 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

691 So. 2d 47 (Farmer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goins v. State
672 So. 2d 30 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)