Farmer v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Farmer v. State

992 S.W.2d 130, 338 Ark. 215, 1999 Ark. LEXIS 331

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Farmer v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 341 Ark. 220 →

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided June 17, 1999·No. CR 99-627·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant Roger Don Farmer, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Jeffrey W. Hatfield, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant Roger Don Farmer, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Jeffrey W. Hatfield, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Farmer v. State, 992 S.W.2d 130, 338 Ark. 215, 1999 Ark. LEXIS 331 (Ark. 1999).

Pincite

992 S.W.2d 130 (Farmer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.