Farmer v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Farmer v. State

103 So. 923, 20 Ala. App. 678

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Farmer v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 19 Ala. App. 560 →

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 17, 1925·No. 8 Div. 280.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

Under the evidence in this case the defendant was clearly entitled to the affirmative charge, as the state failed to meet the burden resting upon it. The court committed reversible error in refusing written charges 2 and 3. . Numerous questions are presented, but there is no necessity to discuss these questions; what has been said being conclusive of this appeal. Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

Under the evidence in this case the defendant was clearly entitled to the affirmative charge, as the state failed to meet the burden resting upon it. The court committed reversible error in refusing written charges 2 and 3. . Numerous questions are presented, but there is no necessity to discuss these questions; what has been said being conclusive of this appeal. Reversed and remanded.

Farmer v. State, 103 So. 923, 20 Ala. App. 678 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

103 So. 923 (Farmer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.