Farmer v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Farmer v. State

103 So. 923, 20 Ala. App. 678

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 17, 1925

Docket8 Div. 280.

StatusPublished

This text of 103 So. 923 (Farmer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farmer v. State, 103 So. 923, 20 Ala. App. 678 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

Under the evidence in this case the defendant was clearly entitled to the affirmative charge, as the state failed to meet the burden resting upon it. The court committed reversible error in refusing written charges 2 and 3. . Numerous questions are presented, but there is no necessity to discuss these questions; what has been said being conclusive of this appeal. Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

Under the evidence in this case the defendant was clearly entitled to the affirmative charge, as the state failed to meet the burden resting upon it. The court committed reversible error in refusing written charges 2 and 3. . Numerous questions are presented, but there is no necessity to discuss these questions; what has been said being conclusive of this appeal. Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 So. 923, 20 Ala. App. 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farmer-v-state-alactapp-1925.