Farmer v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

116 A.D. 922, 101 N.Y.S. 1120

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs.to the appellant to abide the event. Held, that upon the evidence the plaintiff, sis matter of law, failed to show freedom from contributory negligence. All concurred, except Spring and Kruse, JJ., who dissented. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farmer v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 116 A.D. 922, 101 N.Y.S. 1120 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

116 A.D. 922 (Farmer v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.