Farmer v. National Life Ass'n of Hartford

21 N.Y.S. 1056, 74 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 119, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 183
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 13, 1893·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DYKMAN, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside the service of the summons in this action. The summons was sent to the superintendent of the insurance department at Albany, and he gave an admission of due service of the same, in pursuance of a power of attorney which had been executed to him for that purpose, under the provisions of the statute requiring the same. Our conclusion is that the service was valid and sufficient, and the order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farmer v. National Life Ass'n of Hartford, 21 N.Y.S. 1056, 74 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 119, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 183 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

21 N.Y.S. 1056 (Farmer v. National Life Ass'n of Hartford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holland-Washington Mortgage Co. v. County Court
188 P. 199 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1920)