Farmer v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

264 F.2d 248
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 28, 1959
DocketNos. 13669, 13670
StatusPublished

This text of 264 F.2d 248 (Farmer v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farmer v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad, 264 F.2d 248 (6th Cir. 1959).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These consolidated appeals came on to be heard on the record and on the briefs and oral arguments of attorneys for the contending parties;

And it appearing that there was substantial evidence to support the jury verdicts in favor of. the defendant and that no reversible error inheres in the conduct of the trial by the district judge, or in his charge to the jury; and it appearing further that there is no valid ground for the granting of a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence;

The judgment of the district court in each case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
264 F.2d 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farmer-v-louisville-nashville-railroad-ca6-1959.