Farmer v. Hayden

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 24, 2006
Docket05-2185
StatusUnpublished

This text of Farmer v. Hayden (Farmer v. Hayden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farmer v. Hayden, (4th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2185

JEFFREY THOMAS FARMER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL V. HAYDEN; NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District Court of Columbia, at Washington, D.C. James Robertson, District Judge. (05-MC-314-JR)

Submitted: January 19, 2006 Decided: January 24, 2006

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey Thomas Farmer, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Thomas Farmer filed a notice of appeal in the

District Court for the District of Columbia and requested the

appeal be transferred to this Court. Because Farmer is not

appealing a final order or judgment emanating from a court over

which this court has jurisdiction, we are without jurisdiction.

Accordingly, we deny Farmer’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis

and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Farmer v. Hayden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farmer-v-hayden-ca4-2006.