Farmer v. Corley

88 S.E. 23, 103 S.C. 202, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 34
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedFebruary 26, 1916
Docket9266
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 88 S.E. 23 (Farmer v. Corley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farmer v. Corley, 88 S.E. 23, 103 S.C. 202, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 34 (S.C. 1916).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Gary.

M. B. Gunter made a will bearing date the 5th of June, 1907, containing the following provisions:

“I do give and bequeath to my wife, Mrs. Rugie Gunter, all my real estate, consisting of two hundred and eighty acres, more or less, * * * said lands to be held by the said Rugie Gunter and to be her -own during her lifetime. And after the death of the said Rugie Gunter, then to become the property of my adopted daughter, Mrs. Josephine Farmer, to be held by the said Josephine Farmer, and to be her own during her patural life, and after the decease of the said Josephine Farmer, to become the property of hei bodily heirs.
“I do bequeath and give to my wife, Mrs. Rugie Gunter, all my personal property of every description, to be held by her as long as she lives, and after her decease, to be the property of my adopted daughter, Mrs. Josephine Farmer, and her bodily heirs.”

Both the testator and his wife are dead.

The defendant, T. B. Corley, agreed to purchase said land from the plaintiff, Mrs. Josephine Farmer, and she has tendered to him a deed of conveyance, coupled with a demand for the price he agreed to pay for it. He, how *204 ever, refuses to accept the title deed on the ground that she has only a life estate in the premises. ■

She has children, some of whom were born before and some after the testator’s death.

His Honor, the Circuit Judge, held that she took a fee-conditional under the will, and the defendant appealed.

The ruling of his Honor, the Circuit Judge, is sustained by the case of Surles v. McLaurin, 94 S. C. 308, 77 S. E. 944, as well as numerous other cases, which we do not deem it necessary to cite.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lucas v. Shumpert
6 S.E.2d 17 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 S.E. 23, 103 S.C. 202, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farmer-v-corley-sc-1916.