Farmer v. Columbus Buggy Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Farmer v. Columbus Buggy Co.

107 N.W. 1133, 98 Minn. 538, 1906 Minn. LEXIS 638

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJuly 6, 1906

DocketNos. 14,806-(112)

StatusPublished

This text of 107 N.W. 1133 (Farmer v. Columbus Buggy Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farmer v. Columbus Buggy Co., 107 N.W. 1133, 98 Minn. 538, 1906 Minn. LEXIS 638 (Mich. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Action to recover the value of goods and merchandise sold to, and for work' and labor performed for, defendant of the alleged value of $28. Plaintiff had', judgment in the court below, and defendant appealed from an order denying a> new trial.

The assignments of error challenge certain rulings of the court on the admission and exclusion of evidence and its findings of fact. We have examined.: them all, with the result that no reversible error is disclosed.

Order affirmed.

* *

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Action to recover the value of goods and merchandise sold to, and for work' and labor performed for, defendant of the alleged value of $28. Plaintiff had', judgment in the court below, and defendant appealed from an order denying a> new trial.

The assignments of error challenge certain rulings of the court on the admission and exclusion of evidence and its findings of fact. We have examined.: them all, with the result that no reversible error is disclosed.

Order affirmed.

* *

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 N.W. 1133, 98 Minn. 538, 1906 Minn. LEXIS 638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farmer-v-columbus-buggy-co-minn-1906.