Farmer v. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp.
This text of 302 A.D.2d 1017 (Farmer v. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for reargument and renewal granted and, upon reargument and renewal, ordering paragraph and memorandum of memorandum and order entered November 15, 2002 (299 AD2d 856) are amended by providing that the order appealed from is further modified by granting those parts of defendant’s motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6) claims and dismissing those [1018]*1018claims (see Nagel v D & R Realty Corp., 99 NY2d 98) and by denying as moot that part of plaintiffs cross motion seeking leave to supplement the bill of particulars to allege a violation of 12 NYCRR 23-1.16. Present — Wisner, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
302 A.D.2d 1017, 753 N.Y.S.2d 418, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farmer-v-central-hudson-gas-electric-corp-nyappdiv-2003.