Farmer v. Alston

117 S.E.2d 414, 253 N.C. 575, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 680
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 14, 1960·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The evidence when considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff makes out a prima facie case of actionable negligence on the part of defendant. It does not show contributory-negligence on the part of plaintiff as a matter of law. The issues of negligence and contributory negligence were for the jury. The exceptions to admission of evidence and the charge of the court do not disclose error sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farmer v. Alston, 117 S.E.2d 414, 253 N.C. 575, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 680 (N.C. 1960).

117 S.E.2d 414 (Farmer v. Alston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wiggins v. Ponder
130 S.E.2d 402 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)