Farmer, Charles Matthew
This text of Farmer, Charles Matthew (Farmer, Charles Matthew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-59,944-05
EX PARTE CHARLES MATTHEW FARMER, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. D180201AR IN THE 260TH DISTRICT COURT FROM ORANGE COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant pleaded guilty to assault and was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment. Applicant
filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk
forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends, among other things, that his plea was involuntary because trial counsel
provided incorrect advice about parole eligibility. Alternatively, he alleges that he is not being
provided parole review in a timely manner. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him
to relief. Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985); Ex parte Moussazadeh, 361 S.W.3d 684 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2012). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum
for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC . art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial 2
counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. The trial court shall also order the Texas Department of
Criminal Justice’s Office of the General Counsel to obtain a response from a person with knowledge
of relevant facts to respond to Applicant’s claim that he has been denied parole review. In developing
the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects
to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and
wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the
hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court
shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing Applicant’s
claims. The trial court shall make specific findings addressing Applicant’s parole eligibility. The trial
court shall also make specific findings as to whether trial counsel’s performance was deficient and
Applicant would have insisted on a trial but for counsel’s alleged deficient performance. The trial
court shall also make findings addressing whether TDCJ has considered Applicant for release to
parole and if not, whether he has a parole review date. The trial court may make any other findings
and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 3
Filed: August 19, 2020 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Farmer, Charles Matthew, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farmer-charles-matthew-texcrimapp-2020.