Farm Supplies Corp. v. Goldstein
This text of 236 A.D. 751 (Farm Supplies Corp. v. Goldstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur, except Hill, J., who dissents and votes to reverse and to grant the motion, upon the ground that the referee had held the ease between two and three years without making a decision; that plaintiff’s counsel learned of the intention to serve a notice of termination of the reference and importuned the referee to [752]*752make a decision before the notice given by the defendant could be delivered by mail. Such a decision lacks all judicial character. McNamee, J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
236 A.D. 751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farm-supplies-corp-v-goldstein-nyappdiv-1932.