Farm Credit Serv. of Mid-America v. Zaino

738 N.E.2d 1251, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1477, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3003
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 5, 2000
Docket00-505
StatusPublished

This text of 738 N.E.2d 1251 (Farm Credit Serv. of Mid-America v. Zaino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farm Credit Serv. of Mid-America v. Zaino, 738 N.E.2d 1251, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1477, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3003 (Ohio 2000).

Opinion

Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 97-T-889 and 97-T-333. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal and cross-appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. On May 9, 2000, and August 16, 2000, appellanVcross-appellee filed briefs that listed the name of Theodore R. Bots as co-counsel. On September 25, appellant/eross-appellee filed a motion for admission pro hac vice, but it did not include the name of Theodore R. Bots. Mr. Bots is not admitted to practice in Ohio and has not sought admission pro hac vice as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. 1(1) and (2). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the name of Theodore R. Bots be, and hereby is, stricken from appellanVcross-appellee’s briefs and Theodore R. Bots shall not be permitted to participate in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
738 N.E.2d 1251, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1477, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 3003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farm-credit-serv-of-mid-america-v-zaino-ohio-2000.