Farlow v. State

125 S.E. 735, 33 Ga. App. 146, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 778
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 9, 1924
Docket15916
StatusPublished

This text of 125 S.E. 735 (Farlow v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farlow v. State, 125 S.E. 735, 33 Ga. App. 146, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 778 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence amply authorized the defendant’s conviction of violating the prohibition statute. The two special grounds of the motion for a new trial, the one complaining of the court’s refusal to continue the ease, and the other based upon alleged newly discovered evidence, are without merit. The court properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 S.E. 735, 33 Ga. App. 146, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farlow-v-state-gactapp-1924.