Farley v. State
76 So. 3d 1107, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20894, 2011 WL 6843007
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Farley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2691 →
Opinion
Based on a careful review of the record, we conclude that the evidence was simply insufficient to show that appellant, as opposed to some other individual, took the victim’s iPhone.
REVERSED and REMANDED for Entry of Judgment of Acquittal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Farley v. State, 76 So. 3d 1107, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20894, 2011 WL 6843007 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).
76 So. 3d 1107 (Farley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.