Farley v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Farley v. State

80 So. 895, 16 Ala. App. 700

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 17, 1918

Docket1 Div. 309.

StatusPublished

This text of 80 So. 895 (Farley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farley v. State, 80 So. 895, 16 Ala. App. 700 (Ala. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMPORD, J.

The defendant was tried and convicted of a violation of the prohibition law, and from the judgment of conviction he appeals. There is no bill of exceptions in the record, and there is a certificate of the presiding judge that no bill of exceptions has been presented and that the time for presenting same has expired. We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMPORD, J.

The defendant was tried and convicted of a violation of the prohibition law, and from the judgment of conviction he appeals. There is no bill of exceptions in the record, and there is a certificate of the presiding judge that no bill of exceptions has been presented and that the time for presenting same has expired. We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 So. 895, 16 Ala. App. 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farley-v-state-alactapp-1918.