Farley v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Farley v. State

80 So. 895, 16 Ala. App. 700

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided December 17, 1918·No. 1 Div. 309.·Published

Opinion

SAMPORD, J.

The defendant was tried and convicted of a violation of the prohibition law, and from the judgment of conviction he appeals. There is no bill of exceptions in the record, and there is a certificate of the presiding judge that no bill of exceptions has been presented and that the time for presenting same has expired. We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMPORD, J.

The defendant was tried and convicted of a violation of the prohibition law, and from the judgment of conviction he appeals. There is no bill of exceptions in the record, and there is a certificate of the presiding judge that no bill of exceptions has been presented and that the time for presenting same has expired. We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Farley v. State, 80 So. 895, 16 Ala. App. 700 (Ala. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

80 So. 895 (Farley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.