Farley v. Philad. Traction Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Farley v. Philad. Traction Co.

18 A. 1090, 132 Pa. 58, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 768

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 20, 1890

DocketNo. 392

StatusPublished

Cited by16 cases

This text of 18 A. 1090 (Farley v. Philad. Traction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farley v. Philad. Traction Co., 18 A. 1090, 132 Pa. 58, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 768 (Pa. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

There is nothing in the plaintiff’s evidence that would have warranted the jury in rendering a verdict in his favor, and hence there was no error in entering the judgment of nonsuit, and refusing to take it off. Without some evidence, tending to prove that the injury complained of resulted from the defendant company’s negligence, the plaintiff had no right to ask that his case should be submitted to the jury.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

There is nothing in the plaintiff’s evidence that would have warranted the jury in rendering a verdict in his favor, and hence there was no error in entering the judgment of nonsuit, and refusing to take it off. Without some evidence, tending to prove that the injury complained of resulted from the defendant company’s negligence, the plaintiff had no right to ask that his case should be submitted to the jury.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A. 1090, 132 Pa. 58, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farley-v-philad-traction-co-pa-1890.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack