Farley v. Owen-Lewis-Kay Inc.

169 S.E. 702, 47 Ga. App. 45, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 285
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 27, 1933
Docket22602
StatusPublished

This text of 169 S.E. 702 (Farley v. Owen-Lewis-Kay Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farley v. Owen-Lewis-Kay Inc., 169 S.E. 702, 47 Ga. App. 45, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 285 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Guerry, J.

1. The ground of the motion for a new trial based on alleged disqualification of the trial judge is without merit. It does not appear that the defendant himself did not, before the trial, have notice of this alleged disqualification, and the affidavit of counsel is insufficient to establish such relationship between the judge and the plaintiff. Knight v. State, 143 Ga. 678 (8) (85 S. E. 915).

2. The other special grounds of the motion are without merit.

3. The evidence supports the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial based on the general grounds.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Knight v. State
85 S.E. 915 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 S.E. 702, 47 Ga. App. 45, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farley-v-owen-lewis-kay-inc-gactapp-1933.