Farley v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Farley v. New York City Transit Authority

253 A.D.2d 843, 678 N.Y.S.2d 501, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9827

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 28, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 253 A.D.2d 843 (Farley v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farley v. New York City Transit Authority, 253 A.D.2d 843, 678 N.Y.S.2d 501, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9827 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for negligence, medical malpractice, and wrongful death, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), entered September 19, 1997, as granted the motion of the defendant Aurelia Cacatian to disqualify the plaintiffs counsel.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The court did not err in granting the motion of the defendant Aurelia Cacatian to disqualify the plaintiffs attorney (see, Cardinale v Golinello, 43 NY2d 288; see also, Solow v Grace & Co., 83 NY2d 303). Miller, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for negligence, medical malpractice, and wrongful death, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), entered September 19, 1997, as granted the motion of the defendant Aurelia Cacatian to disqualify the plaintiffs counsel.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The court did not err in granting the motion of the defendant Aurelia Cacatian to disqualify the plaintiffs attorney (see, Cardinale v Golinello, 43 NY2d 288; see also, Solow v Grace & Co., 83 NY2d 303). Miller, J. P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D.2d 843, 678 N.Y.S.2d 501, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farley-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack