Farley v. Mahoney
This text of 115 A.D.2d 350 (Farley v. Mahoney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs, for reasons stated in memorandum decision at Supreme Court, Erie County, Killeen, J. Furthermore, the Board of Elections would not have been authorized to place Lo Tempio’s name on the ballot since there was a failure of compliance with Election Law § 6-148 (5) (see, Matter of Scott v Curran, 277 App Div 344, 345, affd 301 NY 693). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Killeen, J.—Election Law art 16.) Present —Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ. (Decided Oct. 25, 1985.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 A.D.2d 350, 496 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farley-v-mahoney-nyappdiv-1985.