Farley v. Harris
This text of 999 So. 2d 707 (Farley v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Russell FARLEY, Appellant,
v.
Warden HARRIS, et al., Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Russell Farley, pro se, Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Marcus O. Graper, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Russell Farley seeks review of a final order dismissing his petition for writ of mandamus in which he challenged a disciplinary action and subsequent forfeiture of gain-time. We grant appellees' motion to dismiss the appeal as moot. Because official records indicate that Mr. Farley was released from prison during the pendency of this appeal, the appeal is moot. See *708 Phillips v. McDonough, 962 So.2d 375 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).
DISMISSED.
BARFIELD, KAHN, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
999 So. 2d 707, 2008 WL 5411769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farley-v-harris-fladistctapp-2008.