Farley v. Carp
748 N.W.2d 849, 481 Mich. 880
This text of 748 N.W.2d 849 (Farley v. Carp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Farley v. Carp, 748 N.W.2d 849, 481 Mich. 880 (Mich. 2008).
Opinion
Elizabeth FARLEY, as Personal Representative for Franklin Farley, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Nevine M. CARP, M.D., John Schairer, D.O., and Garden City Osteopathic Hospital, Defendants, and
Advanced Cardiovascular Health Specialists, P.C., Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court before consideration by the Court of Appeals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
748 N.W.2d 849, 481 Mich. 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farley-v-carp-mich-2008.