Farley v. Bank of America, N.A.

615 F. App'x 804
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 11, 2015·No. No. 15-1733·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alecia Y. Farley and Marvin A. Farley appeal the district court’s order denying certain pretrial motions and a final order granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss the Farleys’ civil complaint and to impose non-monetary sanctions, namely, a prefil-ing injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Farley v. Bank of Am., N.A., No. 3:14-cv-00568-JRS, 2015 WL 3651165 (E.D. Va. Oct. 28, 2014; June 11, 2015). We grant the Farleys’ motion to file a corrected informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farley v. Bank of America, N.A., 615 F. App'x 804 (4th Cir. 2015).

615 F. App'x 804 (Farley v. Bank of America, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rivers v. Wynne
W.D. Virginia, 2023