Farley v. Adriance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Farley v. Adriance

261 P. 1116, 124 Kan. 598, 1927 Kan. LEXIS 388

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedDecember 10, 1927

DocketNo. 27,612; No. 27,632

StatusPublished

This text of 261 P. 1116 (Farley v. Adriance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farley v. Adriance, 261 P. 1116, 124 Kan. 598, 1927 Kan. LEXIS 388 (kan 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

The action was one by the receiver of The Mid-West Mutual Insurance Company against some three thousand of its policyholders, residing in many counties of the state, to recover from each a sum equal to one annual premium on his policy. The questions presented are similar to those considered in Hall v. Hall, 124 Kan. 466, 260 Pac. 645. The decision in that case is controlling here.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

The action was one by the receiver of The Mid-West Mutual Insurance Company against some three thousand of its policyholders, residing in many counties of the state, to recover from each a sum equal to one annual premium on his policy. The questions presented are similar to those considered in Hall v. Hall, 124 Kan. 466, 260 Pac. 645. The decision in that case is controlling here.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 P. 1116, 124 Kan. 598, 1927 Kan. LEXIS 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farley-v-adriance-kan-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack