FARJAM

17 I. & N. Dec. 603
CourtBoard of Immigration Appeals
DecidedJuly 1, 1980
DocketID 2843
StatusPublished

This text of 17 I. & N. Dec. 603 (FARJAM) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Board of Immigration Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
FARJAM, 17 I. & N. Dec. 603 (bia 1980).

Opinion

Interim Decision #2843

MATTER OF FARJAM In Deportation Proceedings A-24023594 Decided by Board December 19, 1980 Where respondent, a national of Iran, moved to reopen, motion granted in light of Service policy of December 4, 1980, not to oppose reopening to apply for asylum. CHARGE Order. Act of 1952—Sec. 241(a)(2) [8 U.S.C. 1251(a)(2)j—Nonimmigrant—remained longer than permitted ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT: ON BEHALF OF SERVICE Donald Lindover, Esquire Daniel Meisner 233 Broadway Trial Attorney New York, New York 10007 Gerald S. Hurwitz Appellate Trial Attorney BY: Milhollan, Chairman; Maniatis, Appleman, and Maguire, Board Members

In a decision dated January 16, 1980, the respondent, a native and citizen of Iran, was found deportable under section 241(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1251(a)(2), as a nonim- migrant who had remained in the United States for a longer time than permitted.' lie was granted voluntary departure until July 15, 1080, but failed to depart as required. A Warrant of Deportation was issued on July 17, 1980 and October 24, 1980, the respondent submitted a motion to reopen for the purpose of applying for political asylum. The motion was subsequently denied by an immigration judge on November 3, 1980. The respondent has appealed that decision. The appeal will be sustained and the record remanded. In a memorandum to the Chief of the Justice Department's General Litigation and Legal Advice Section, Criminal Division, dated December 4, 1980, the Deputy General Counsel of the Immigration and Naturalization Service stated that: "The Service has now determined

' At the deportation hearing, held on January 16, 1980, the respondent admitted the factual allegations contained in the Order to Show Cause, conceded deportability, and designated Iran as the country of deportation. Interim Decision #2843 that it will not oppose motions to reopen to apply for asylum submitted by Iranian nationals." In response to the motion to reopen in the instant case, the Appellate Trial Attorney has stated that "Pursuant to the Service policy out lined in the December 4, 1980, memorandum from Paul W. Schmidt, Deputy General Counsel to Lawrence Lippe, Chief of the Justice Department's General Litigation and Legal Advice Section, Criminal Division, we do not oppose the reopening of this case for the purpose of applying for political asylum." Accordingly, in recognition of the Service's policy, set forth above, the appeal will be sustained, the motion to reopen granted, and the record remanded to permit the respondent to apply for political asylum. ORDER: The appeal is sustained. The proceedings are reopened, and the record is remanded to the immigration judge for reconsidera- tion of the respondent's application for political asylum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 I. & N. Dec. 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farjam-bia-1980.