Farivar v. Yekta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Farivar v. Yekta

305 S.E.2d 422, 166 Ga. App. 676, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2291

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 18, 1983

Docket66113

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 305 S.E.2d 422 (Farivar v. Yekta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farivar v. Yekta, 305 S.E.2d 422, 166 Ga. App. 676, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2291 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

Birdsong, Judge.

Dismissal of appeal. Michael Yekta gave Mahmoud Farivar $10,515 in Iranian money so that Farivar, as broker, could exchange the Iranian assets for U. S. currency. Yekta obtained a judgment against Farivar in the amount above stated. Farivar filed a notice of appeal to the adverse judgment which was filed in this court on January 31,1983. Pursuant to Rule 27 (a) and Rule 14 of this court, on March 2, 1983, counsel for Farivar was directed to file an enumeration of errors and brief not later than the end of the working day of March 7,1983, or suffer dismissal. No enumerations of error or brief have been filed to this date in support of the notice of appeal notwithstanding the order of this court. It is apparent therefore that the appeal has been abandoned. See Henry v. State, 162 Ga. App. 108 (290 SE2d 210). In the face of the abandonment of the appeal because of the failure to file an enumeration of errors or brief, we order the appeal dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Shulman, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Birdsong, Judge.

Dismissal of appeal. Michael Yekta gave Mahmoud Farivar $10,515 in Iranian money so that Farivar, as broker, could exchange the Iranian assets for U. S. currency. Yekta obtained a judgment against Farivar in the amount above stated. Farivar filed a notice of appeal to the adverse judgment which was filed in this court on January 31,1983. Pursuant to Rule 27 (a) and Rule 14 of this court, on March 2, 1983, counsel for Farivar was directed to file an enumeration of errors and brief not later than the end of the working day of March 7,1983, or suffer dismissal. No enumerations of error or brief have been filed to this date in support of the notice of appeal notwithstanding the order of this court. It is apparent therefore that the appeal has been abandoned. See Henry v. State, 162 Ga. App. 108 (290 SE2d 210). In the face of the abandonment of the appeal because of the failure to file an enumeration of errors or brief, we order the appeal dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Shulman, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

305 S.E.2d 422, 166 Ga. App. 676, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farivar-v-yekta-gactapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack