Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Farish v. Holmgren

Farish v. Holmgren

407 So. 2d 337, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21926
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 16, 1981
DocketNo. 80-1004
StatusPublished

This text of 407 So. 2d 337 (Farish v. Holmgren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farish v. Holmgren, 407 So. 2d 337, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21926 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Kessler v. Townsley, 132 Fla. 744, 182 So. 232 (1938); Catlett v. Chestnut, 108 Fla. 475, 146 So. 547 (1933); Lee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 303 So.2d 349 (Fla.3d DCA 1974); 70 C.J.S. Perjury § 92 (1951).

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ, and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
303 So. 2d 349 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Kessler v. Townsley
182 So. 232 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Catlett v. Chestnut
146 So. 547 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
407 So. 2d 337, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farish-v-holmgren-fladistctapp-1981.