Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Faris ex rel. Strickland v. Wennet

Faris ex rel. Strickland v. Wennet

606 So. 2d 512, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11175, 1992 WL 310324
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 28, 1992
DocketNo. 92-2549
StatusPublished

This text of 606 So. 2d 512 (Faris ex rel. Strickland v. Wennet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Faris ex rel. Strickland v. Wennet, 606 So. 2d 512, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11175, 1992 WL 310324 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner has filed a petition for writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to grant him a belated appeal because the court order denying his Rule 3.850 motion failed to advise him of his right to appeal.

We treat the petition as one for habeas corpus and grant the writ entitling petitioner to a belated appeal. State ex rel. Shevin v. District Court of Appeal, Third District, 316 So.2d 50 (Fla.1975); Marsh v. State, 581 So.2d 653 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). Petitioner is directed to file his notice of appeal within thirty days from date of this opinion.

DOWNEY, STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marsh v. State
581 So. 2d 653 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
State Ex Rel. Shevin v. District Court of Appeal
316 So. 2d 50 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
606 So. 2d 512, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11175, 1992 WL 310324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faris-ex-rel-strickland-v-wennet-fladistctapp-1992.