Farina v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided February 3, 2020·No. 1:18-cv-01433·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

JASON FARINA, CHARLES GARDNER, CASE NO.: 18-cv-01433 (PKC) DOROTHY TROIANO, DELORIS RITCHIE and MIRIAN ROJAS on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, [XPXRXOXPXOXXSXEXDX] STIPULATED Plaintiffs, PROTECTIVE ORDER AND CONFIDENTIALITY vs. AGREEMENT

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, TRIBOROUGH BRIDGE AND TUNNEL AUTHORITY, THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK STATE THRUWAY AUTHORITY and CONDUENT STATE AND LOCAL SOLUTIONS, INC.,

Defendants. P. KEVIN CASTEL, U.S.D.J.: WHEREAS, certain information, testimony, and documents may be sought, produced, or exhibited by and among the parties to the captioned action (the “Action”), or by third parties in connection with the Action, which information, testimony, and documents the party making the production believes in good faith to constitute and contain trade secrets, proprietary business information, competitively sensitive information, or non-public personal, medical, business, or financial information; WHEREAS a protective order would facilitate the production, exchange, and discovery of documents, testimony, and information in connection with the Action while preserving the parties’ respective positions as to whether particular documents, testimony, or information merit confidential treatment; and WHEREAS this matter has come before the Court, by stipulation of the parties, for the entry of a protective order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c), limiting the review, copying, dissemination and filing of confidential and/or proprietary documents, testimony, and information to be produced by any party and their respective counsel or by any non-party in the course of discovery in this matter to the extent set forth below, and the parties, by, between and

among their respective counsel, having stipulated and agreed to the terms set forth herein, and good cause having been shown; IT IS hereby ORDERED that:

1. This Stipulated Protective Order Governing the Production and Exchange of Confidential Information (“Protective Order”) shall govern the handling of documents, testimony, and all other information produced by or between the parties to the Action or by third parties in connection with the Action, including all documents, testimony, and information produced pursuant to interrogatories, depositions, requests for production of documents, subpoenas, requests for admissions, or other requests for disclosures (whether formal or informal), and all information provided, submitted, or exhibited by the parties hereto or third parties in connection with any evidentiary hearings or other proceedings conducted during the course of the Action. 2. As used herein:

(a) “Confidential Information” shall mean all documents, electronically stored information, testimony, and information designated as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential—Outside Counsel Only” by any party pursuant to the terms of this Protective Order, including the contents and all copies, excerpts, extracts, and summaries of such documents, testimony, and information, provided that such designation has not been successfully challenged and finally revoked. “Confidential Information” also includes information derived from any such document. (b) “Producing Party” shall mean the parties to this Action and any third parties producing “Confidential Information” in connection with depositions,

document production, or otherwise, or the party asserting the confidentiality privilege, as the case may be. (c) “Receiving Party” shall mean the parties to this Action and any third parties receiving “Confidential Information” in connection with depositions, document production, or otherwise. (d) “Qualified Person” shall mean any person authorized to receive or review “Confidential Information” pursuant to paragraphs 7 or 8 herein, as the case

may be. 3. The person designating any discovery material as “Confidential” may designate as “Confidential” material including (a) financial information previously nondisclosed to the public (including without limitation profitability reports or estimates, cost breakdowns, percentage fees, design fees, royalty rates, minimum guarantee payments, settlement matrices, sales reports, and sale margins); (b) material previously nondisclosed to the public relating to ownership or control of any nonpublic company; (c) business plans, contracts, amendments,

change orders, product development information, or marketing plans previously nondisclosed to the public; (d) commercially sensitive and/or proprietary information previously nondisclosed to the public; (e) any information of a personal or intimate nature regarding any individual, including information required to be redacted in public filings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2, and personal identifying information protected from disclosure by federal or state privacy laws; (f) any other information of a proprietary or confidential nature within the meaning of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26; or (g) any other category of information hereinafter given confidential status by the Court. 4. The person designating any discovery material as “Highly Confidential—

Outside Counsel Only” may designate as “Highly Confidential—Outside Counsel Only” any discovery material containing extremely sensitive, highly confidential, non-public information, the disclosure of which would create a substantial risk of competitive or business injury. 5. Any party, subpoenaed nonparty, or other third party whose information may be disclosed in connection with this Action may designate documents produced, testimony given, or other information exchanged in connection with this Action as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential—Outside Counsel Only” either by notation on the document, statement

on the record of the deposition, designation pursuant to this Stipulation and Order, or written advice to the respective undersigned counsel for the parties hereto. Electronic documents and information, if any, shall be designated as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential—Outside Counsel Only” by any of the foregoing methods or pursuant to a procedure to be agreed upon by counsel for the parties. 6. All Confidential Information shall be used solely for the purpose of this Action, and no person receiving such Confidential Information shall, directly or indirectly, use,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farina v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Farina v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Farina v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)