Fariello v. Crystal Hills Mini Farms

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fariello v. Crystal Hills Mini Farms

890 So. 2d 552, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 181, 2005 WL 74108

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 14, 2005·No. No. 5D04-3945·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied. Petitioner appealed an order which in part, prohibited her from filing any pro se pleadings in the underlying civil action. Petitioner filed an appeal of that order and the circuit court attempted to strike it. The circuit court did not have jurisdiction to strike petitioner’s pro se notice of appeal. Petitioner’s pro se notice of appeal was transferred to this court, and the appeal is proceeding in the normal and ordinary course of appellate procedure. Consequently, prohibition is unnecessary.

PETITION DENIED.

SAWAYA, C.J., GRIFFIN, and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied. Petitioner appealed an order which in part, prohibited her from filing any pro se pleadings in the underlying civil action. Petitioner filed an appeal of that order and the circuit court attempted to strike it. The circuit court did not have jurisdiction to strike petitioner’s pro se notice of appeal. Petitioner’s pro se notice of appeal was transferred to this court, and the appeal is proceeding in the normal and ordinary course of appellate procedure. Consequently, prohibition is unnecessary.

PETITION DENIED.

SAWAYA, C.J., GRIFFIN, and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Fariello v. Crystal Hills Mini Farms, 890 So. 2d 552, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 181, 2005 WL 74108 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

890 So. 2d 552 (Fariello v. Crystal Hills Mini Farms) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related