Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Fariello v. Crystal Hills Mini Farms

Fariello v. Crystal Hills Mini Farms

890 So. 2d 552, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 181, 2005 WL 74108
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 14, 2005
DocketNo. 5D04-3945
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 890 So. 2d 552 (Fariello v. Crystal Hills Mini Farms) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fariello v. Crystal Hills Mini Farms, 890 So. 2d 552, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 181, 2005 WL 74108 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied. Petitioner appealed an order which in part, prohibited her from filing any pro se pleadings in the underlying civil action. Petitioner filed an appeal of that order and the circuit court attempted to strike it. The circuit court did not have jurisdiction to strike petitioner’s pro se notice of appeal. Petitioner’s pro se notice of appeal was transferred to this court, and the appeal is proceeding in the normal and ordinary course of appellate procedure. Consequently, prohibition is unnecessary.

PETITION DENIED.

SAWAYA, C.J., GRIFFIN, and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SM v. Department of Children and Families
890 So. 2d 552 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
890 So. 2d 552, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 181, 2005 WL 74108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fariello-v-crystal-hills-mini-farms-fladistctapp-2005.