Fariel v. Board of Education of Valley Stream Union Free School District 13
This text of 230 A.D.2d 854 (Fariel v. Board of Education of Valley Stream Union Free School District 13) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Education of the Valley Stream Union Free School District 13, dated October 4, 1994, which denied the petitioner retroactive membership in the New York State Teachers’ Retirement System, the Board of Education of the Valley Stream Union Free School District 13 appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Schmidt, J.), entered May 24, 1995, which granted the petition and vacated its determination.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that the determination denying the petitioner retroactive membership in the retirement system was arbitrary and capricious and without a rational basis. The affidavit belatedly submitted by the Board [855]*855of Education of the Valley Stream Union Free School District 13, with its answer to the petition containing further justification for its decision, cannot be considered because judicial review of an administrative determination is limited to the grounds invoked by the administrative body (see, Matter of Scherbyn v Wayne-Finger Lakes Bd. of Coop. Educ. Servs., 77 NY2d 753, 758-759). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
230 A.D.2d 854, 646 N.Y.S.2d 545, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fariel-v-board-of-education-of-valley-stream-union-free-school-district-13-nyappdiv-1996.