Fariel v. Board of Education of Valley Stream Union Free School District 13

230 A.D.2d 854, 646 N.Y.S.2d 545, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8558
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 19, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 230 A.D.2d 854 (Fariel v. Board of Education of Valley Stream Union Free School District 13) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fariel v. Board of Education of Valley Stream Union Free School District 13, 230 A.D.2d 854, 646 N.Y.S.2d 545, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8558 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Education of the Valley Stream Union Free School District 13, dated October 4, 1994, which denied the petitioner retroactive membership in the New York State Teachers’ Retirement System, the Board of Education of the Valley Stream Union Free School District 13 appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Schmidt, J.), entered May 24, 1995, which granted the petition and vacated its determination.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the determination denying the petitioner retroactive membership in the retirement system was arbitrary and capricious and without a rational basis. The affidavit belatedly submitted by the Board [855]*855of Education of the Valley Stream Union Free School District 13, with its answer to the petition containing further justification for its decision, cannot be considered because judicial review of an administrative determination is limited to the grounds invoked by the administrative body (see, Matter of Scherbyn v Wayne-Finger Lakes Bd. of Coop. Educ. Servs., 77 NY2d 753, 758-759). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the petition.

Miller, J. P., O’Brien, Sullivan and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zinman v. Board of Education
248 A.D.2d 716 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Scanlan v. Buffalo Public School System
687 N.E.2d 1334 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
Kaufman v. Board of Education of Jericho Union Free School District
236 A.D.2d 538 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Leister v. Board of Education of the Brentwood Union Free School District
232 A.D.2d 641 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
230 A.D.2d 854, 646 N.Y.S.2d 545, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fariel-v-board-of-education-of-valley-stream-union-free-school-district-13-nyappdiv-1996.