Farideh Richardson v. Michael J. Astrue

Eighth Circuit

Farideh Richardson v. Michael J. Astrue

355 F. App'x 978

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedDecember 11, 2009

Docket08-3967

StatusUnpublished

This text of 355 F. App'x 978 (Farideh Richardson v. Michael J. Astrue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farideh Richardson v. Michael J. Astrue, 355 F. App'x 978 (8th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Farideh Richardson, on behalf of herself and her children, appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of her pro se social security appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have carefully reviewed the record de novo, see In Home Health, Inc. v. Shalala, 272 F.3d 554, 559 (8th Cir.2001), and conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. We also deny the pending motions.

1

. The Honorable Robert E. Larsen, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Farideh Richardson, on behalf of herself and her children, appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of her pro se social security appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have carefully reviewed the record de novo, see In Home Health, Inc. v. Shalala, 272 F.3d 554, 559 (8th Cir.2001), and conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. We also deny the pending motions.

1

. The Honorable Robert E. Larsen, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

355 F. App'x 978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farideh-richardson-v-michael-j-astrue-ca8-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack