Farideh Richardson v. Michael J. Astrue

355 F. App'x 978
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided December 11, 2009·No. 08-3967·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Farideh Richardson, on behalf of herself and her children, appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of her pro se social security appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have carefully reviewed the record de novo, see In Home Health, Inc. v. Shalala, 272 F.3d 554, 559 (8th Cir.2001), and conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. We also deny the pending motions.

1

. The Honorable Robert E. Larsen, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farideh Richardson v. Michael J. Astrue, 355 F. App'x 978 (8th Cir. 2009).

355 F. App'x 978 (Farideh Richardson v. Michael J. Astrue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related