Faria v. First National Supermarkets, Inc.

651 A.2d 758, 36 Conn. App. 945, 1995 Conn. App. LEXIS 21
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedJanuary 17, 1995
Docket12856
StatusPublished

This text of 651 A.2d 758 (Faria v. First National Supermarkets, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Faria v. First National Supermarkets, Inc., 651 A.2d 758, 36 Conn. App. 945, 1995 Conn. App. LEXIS 21 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from the judgment rendered following the granting of the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict in a slip and fall case. An examination of the transcript and the record shows that there was no evidence as to the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s fall. See Flemington v. Garnett, 231 Conn. 77, 86, 646 A.2d 1308 (1994); Doe v. Manheimer, 212 Conn. 748, 757-59, 563 A.2d 699 (1989); Wu v. Fair-field, 204 Conn. 435, 438, 528 A.2d 364 (1987). All other issues are moot.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wei Ping Wu v. Town of Fairfield
528 A.2d 364 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1987)
Doe v. Manheimer
563 A.2d 699 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1989)
Fleming v. Garnett
646 A.2d 1308 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
651 A.2d 758, 36 Conn. App. 945, 1995 Conn. App. LEXIS 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faria-v-first-national-supermarkets-inc-connappct-1995.