Farfaglia v. Loveall

222 A.D.2d 1127, 636 N.Y.S.2d 702, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14362
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 22, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 222 A.D.2d 1127 (Farfaglia v. Loveall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farfaglia v. Loveall, 222 A.D.2d 1127, 636 N.Y.S.2d 702, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14362 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

—Motion for summary reversal and a new trial denied with leave to renew. Memorandum: Although a transcript of the proceedings before the Hearing Examiner is unavailable, the Hearing Examiner made detailed findings of fact. It is unclear whether respondent wishes to challenge the findings of fact or the conclusions of law on this appeal. Because respondent has failed to raise an issue that the testimony failed to support the findings of fact, the motion is denied with leave to renew upon a showing that a transcript of the proceedings is necessary to a determination of the appeal and that there are no alternative means to reconstruct the record without such transcript. Present— Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stewart v. Soda
239 A.D.2d 966 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
222 A.D.2d 1127, 636 N.Y.S.2d 702, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farfaglia-v-loveall-nyappdiv-1995.