Farewell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Farewell v. State

553 S.W.3d 892

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 14, 2018·No. No. ED 105333·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*893Roderick Farewell appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

*893Roderick Farewell appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Farewell v. State, 553 S.W.3d 892 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

553 S.W.3d 892 (Farewell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.