Farewell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Farewell v. State

553 S.W.3d 892

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 14, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105333

StatusPublished

This text of 553 S.W.3d 892 (Farewell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farewell v. State, 553 S.W.3d 892 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*893Roderick Farewell appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

*893Roderick Farewell appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

553 S.W.3d 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farewell-v-state-moctapp-2018.