Fares v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Opinion
Soraya F. Fares and Marie Assa’ad-Faltas appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on their challenges to ongoing immigration proceedings and their claims under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Fares v. INS, No. CA-96-540-3-P (W.D.N.C. filed Oct. 27, 1998, entered Oct. 28, 1998; filed Oct. 8, 1999, entered Oct. 12, 1999; filed Jan. 10, 2000, entered Jan. 12, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
11 F. App'x 137 (Fares v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.