Fares v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service
This text of 11 F. App'x 137 (Fares v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Soraya F. Fares and Marie Assa’ad-Faltas appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on their challenges to ongoing immigration proceedings and their claims under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Fares v. INS, No. CA-96-540-3-P (W.D.N.C. filed Oct. 27, 1998, entered Oct. 28, 1998; filed Oct. 8, 1999, entered Oct. 12, 1999; filed Jan. 10, 2000, entered Jan. 12, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 F. App'x 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fares-v-us-immigration-naturalization-service-ca4-2001.