Fares v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service

11 F. App'x 137
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 24, 2001·No. 99-2689·Unpublished·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Soraya F. Fares and Marie Assa’ad-Faltas appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on their challenges to ongoing immigration proceedings and their claims under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Fares v. INS, No. CA-96-540-3-P (W.D.N.C. filed Oct. 27, 1998, entered Oct. 28, 1998; filed Oct. 8, 1999, entered Oct. 12, 1999; filed Jan. 10, 2000, entered Jan. 12, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fares v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 11 F. App'x 137 (4th Cir. 2001).

11 F. App'x 137 (Fares v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Case
D. Maryland, 2026
Williams v. Nestrick
E.D. Virginia, 2021
VanHorn v. Nebraska State Racing Commission
304 F. Supp. 2d 1151 (D. Nebraska, 2004)