Farerh v. Farerh
175 A. 107, 117 N.J. Eq. 61, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 798
Opinion
The decree under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Advisory Master Herr.
For affirmance — The Ci-iiee-Justice, Trenci-iard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Farerh v. Farerh, 175 A. 107, 117 N.J. Eq. 61, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 798 (N.J. 1934).
175 A. 107 (Farerh v. Farerh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lysick v. Lysick
220 A.2d 702 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1966)
Wheeler v. Wheeler
145 A.2d 796 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)